PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLY vs. ABNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLY vs. ABNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than ABNY's 1.09% return.


TSLY

1D
1.66%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
-5.22%
6M
-7.03%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
10Y*

ABNY

1D
1.11%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.09%
6M
6.68%
1Y
1.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLY vs. ABNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLY
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
-5.22%13.62%47.92%
ABNY
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF
1.09%-2.05%-9.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLY and ABNY is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLY vs. ABNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLY
TSLY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TSLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ABNY
ABNY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ABNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNY Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLY vs. ABNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLYABNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.01

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

-0.07

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

-0.15

+3.42

TSLY vs. ABNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the ABNY Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLY and ABNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLY vs. ABNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, which is greater than ABNY's maximum drawdown of -31.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and ABNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLYABNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.52%

-31.62%

-17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.64%

-17.87%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.38%

-15.00%

+3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.92%

-16.24%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.09%

9.01%

+0.08%

Volatility

TSLY vs. ABNY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF (ABNY) at 5.94%. This indicates that TSLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLYABNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.68%

5.94%

+6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.97%

19.17%

+4.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.92%

24.75%

+11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.59%

30.00%

+15.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.59%

30.00%

+15.59%

TSLY vs. ABNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ABNY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLY vs. ABNY - Dividend Comparison

TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.90%, more than ABNY's 51.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ABNY
YieldMax ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF
51.58%53.45%22.09%0.00%
TSLY
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
83.90%91.19%82.30%76.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLY and ABNY have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLY has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to ABNY (5.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLY dropped -49.52% vs ABNY's -31.62%.

On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 28.06% vs 1.04% for ABNY. On fees, ABNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, ABNY has been the lower-risk option at 5.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 28.06% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.

TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 83.90%, compared with 51.58% for ABNY.

TSLY is categorized as Options Trading, while ABNY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLY and 0.99% for ABNY.

TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLY and ABNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer