TSLT vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLT returned 3.78% vs 6522.95% for MUU. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLT charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.

Performance

TSLT vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -21.79% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.

TSLT

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 13.53%
• YTD: -21.79%
• 6M: -22.60%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: 218.90%
• YTD: 961.23%
• 6M: 1,422.01%
• 1Y: 6,522.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	-21.79%	-29.49%	142.82%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	961.23%	599.03%	-43.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and MUU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024	0.35

Return for Risk

TSLT vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT

TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 11
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLT	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	50.40	-50.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	7.17	-6.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.91	-0.82
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	125.85	-125.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.14	426.84	-426.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLT vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 50.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLT and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLT	MUU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04	50.40	-50.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	6.68	-6.68

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLT	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-75.07%	-8.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.08%	-52.72%	-2.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.01%	0.00%	-62.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.23%	-23.44%	-26.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.07%	15.51%	+11.56%

Volatility

TSLT vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) is 24.38%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that TSLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLT	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.38%	54.78%	-30.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.35%	105.07%	-50.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.40%	131.77%	-39.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.05%	133.67%	-16.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	117.05%	133.67%	-16.62%

TSLT vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLT vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.46%	4.27%	0.31%
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLT and MUU in my portfolio?

TSLT and MUU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLT or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to TSLT (24.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLT dropped -83.16% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, TSLT or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 3.78% for TSLT. On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSLT has been the lower-risk option at 24.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLT or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLT or MUU?

TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLT or MUU?

MUU has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.

What is the main difference between TSLT and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 1.06% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.