TSLT vs. INTW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSLT is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, TSLT returned 11.54% vs 897.85% for INTW. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLT charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

TSLT vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -35.75% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 394.65% return.

TSLT

• 1D: -6.38%
• 1M: -8.97%
• 6M: -34.90%
• YTD: -35.75%
• 1Y: 11.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -12.15%
• 1M: -36.39%
• 6M: 254.55%
• YTD: 394.65%
• 1Y: 897.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	-35.75%	7.23%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	394.65%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and INTW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.32

TSLT vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSLT	INTW
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TSLT vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT

TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 14
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 11

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 96
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLT	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	5.93	-5.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	4.00	-3.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.50	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	18.38	-18.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.40	40.12	-39.72

TSLT vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 5.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLT and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLT	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-60.58%	-22.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.08%	-49.34%	-5.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.79%	-49.09%	-19.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.94%	-29.56%	-21.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.88%	22.57%	+6.31%

Volatility

TSLT vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) is 34.98%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.27%. This indicates that TSLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLT	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.98%	55.27%	-20.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.37%	124.21%	-61.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	89.33%	153.39%	-64.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.20%	149.42%	-32.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	117.20%	149.42%	-32.22%

TSLT vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLT vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSLT nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLT and INTW in my portfolio?

TSLT and INTW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLT or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.27%) compared to TSLT (34.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLT dropped -83.16% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, TSLT or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 897.85% vs 11.54% for TSLT. On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSLT has been the lower-risk option at 34.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLT or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 897.85% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLT or INTW?

TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLT or INTW?

TSLT and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TSLT and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.93 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.