PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLT vs. GMEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLT vs. GMEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -37.06% return, which is significantly lower than GMEU's -7.00% return.


TSLT

1D
-1.75%
1M
-9.96%
6M
-33.05%
YTD
-37.06%
1Y
4.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GMEU

1D
-2.53%
1M
1.76%
6M
-16.41%
YTD
-7.00%
1Y
-45.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. GMEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSLT
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
-37.06%85.55%
GMEU
T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF
-7.00%-65.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and GMEU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLT vs. GMEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT
TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GMEU
GMEU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GMEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMEU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GMEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMEU Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. GMEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLTGMEUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.92

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

-0.77

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

-1.16

+1.30

TSLT vs. GMEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the GMEU Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLT and GMEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. GMEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum GMEU drawdown of -80.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and GMEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLTGMEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-80.76%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.08%

-58.94%

+3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.43%

-79.39%

+9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.02%

-64.49%

+13.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.32%

39.08%

-9.76%

Volatility

TSLT vs. GMEU - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) has a higher volatility of 33.60% compared to T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF (GMEU) at 15.46%. This indicates that TSLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLTGMEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.60%

15.46%

+18.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.21%

55.87%

+6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.08%

70.98%

+18.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.95%

86.79%

+30.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.95%

86.79%

+30.16%

TSLT vs. GMEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GMEU's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLT vs. GMEU - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSLT nor GMEU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLT and GMEU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLT has higher volatility (33.60%) compared to GMEU (15.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLT dropped -83.16% vs GMEU's -80.76%.

On 1-year performance, TSLT leads with 4.09% vs -45.45% for GMEU. On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, GMEU has been the lower-risk option at 15.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLT has performed better with a 4.09% return vs -45.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GMEU.

TSLT and GMEU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 1.50% for GMEU.

TSLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLT and GMEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer