TSLT vs. CRCD
TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Tesla, Inc. (200%), while CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. TSLT is passively managed, while CRCD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. TSLT charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.
Performance
TSLT vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -35.75% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -80.82% return.
TSLT
- 1D
- -6.38%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -34.90%
- YTD
- -35.75%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRCD
- 1D
- 9.65%
- 1M
- 25.76%
- 6M
- -78.50%
- YTD
- -80.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLT vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -35.75% | 2.26% |
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -80.82% | 38.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLT and CRCD is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLT vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank
TSLT
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLT vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLT | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLT vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, smaller than the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and CRCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLT | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -96.95% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.79% | -90.91% | +22.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.94% | -59.54% | +8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.88% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLT vs. CRCD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLT | CRCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.33% | 201.32% | -111.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.20% | 201.32% | -84.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.20% | 201.32% | -84.12% |
TSLT vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLT vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLT nor CRCD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLT and CRCD have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
TSLT and CRCD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TSLT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 1.50% for CRCD.
Find the right allocation for TSLT and CRCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer