TSLT vs. BRKL
TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSLT is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.16 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSLT charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
TSLT vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSLT
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -40.70%
- 6M
- -57.20%
- YTD
- -61.81%
- 1Y
- -27.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -23.82%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $37.83M | $41.41M | $54.11M |
TSLT vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -47.80% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLT and BRKL is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLT vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
TSLT
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLT vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLT | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLT vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLT | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -7.03% | -76.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.45% | -0.13% | -81.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.45% | -4.14% | -47.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.01% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLT vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLT | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.45% | 30.99% | +61.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.71% | 30.99% | +86.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.71% | 30.99% | +86.72% |
TSLT vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLT vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLT nor BRKL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLT and BRKL have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLT.
TSLT and BRKL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for TSLT and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer