TSLT vs. AAPX
TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) and AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLT returned -15.30% vs 81.26% for AAPX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLT vs. AAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -38.04% return, which is significantly lower than AAPX's 8.46% return.
TSLT
- 1D
- -11.45%
- 1M
- -22.15%
- YTD
- -38.04%
- 6M
- -47.16%
- 1Y
- -15.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPX
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 81.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLT vs. AAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -38.04% | -29.49% | 74.97% |
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 8.46% | -4.95% | 58.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLT and AAPX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.36 |
TSLT vs. AAPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSLT
AAPX
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSLT
AAPX
-
Basic Materials
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Communication Services
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Consumer Defensive
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Energy
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Financial Services
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Healthcare
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Industrials
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Real Estate
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Technology
TSLT
-
AAPX
Utilities
TSLT
-
AAPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLT vs. AAPX — Risk / Return Rank
TSLT
AAPX
TSLT vs. AAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLT | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.31 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 2.71 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 6.32 | -6.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLT vs. AAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than AAPX's maximum drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and AAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLT | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -58.55% | -24.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.08% | -30.12% | -24.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.90% | -13.68% | -56.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.62% | -19.16% | -31.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.13% | 12.90% | +15.23% |
Volatility
TSLT vs. AAPX - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) has a higher volatility of 28.45% compared to T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) at 14.33%. This indicates that TSLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLT | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.45% | 14.33% | +14.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.51% | 33.57% | +22.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.95% | 45.54% | +43.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.87% | 54.49% | +62.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.87% | 54.49% | +62.38% |
TSLT vs. AAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLT and AAPX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
TSLT vs. AAPX - Dividend Comparison
TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.61% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLT and AAPX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLT has higher volatility (28.45%) compared to AAPX (14.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLT dropped -83.16% vs AAPX's -58.55%.
On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 81.26% vs -15.30% for TSLT. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 14.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 81.26% return vs -15.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLT and AAPX have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.
AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLT and AAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer