PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPX vs. NVDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AAPX vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AAPX vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
-16.40%-4.95%56.69%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
-18.63%26.24%298.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a -16.40% return, which is significantly higher than NVDX's -18.63% return.


AAPX

1D
5.81%
1M
-8.93%
YTD
-16.40%
6M
-8.56%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDX

1D
11.17%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
-18.63%
6M
-24.71%
1Y
84.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AAPX vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAPX and NVDX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Return for Risk

AAPX vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPXNVDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.10

1.03

-0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.62

1.81

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

1.86

-1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.57

4.48

-3.91

AAPX vs. NVDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the NVDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPX and NVDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPXNVDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

1.03

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.21

-1.02

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and NVDX is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AAPX vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than NVDX's 4.12% yield.


TTM20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
0.80%0.67%21.46%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
4.12%3.35%15.48%

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum NVDX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and NVDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPXNVDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-68.19%

+9.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.67%

-43.76%

+2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.06%

-37.47%

+11.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-20.49%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.55%

18.14%

-0.59%

Volatility

AAPX vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) is 11.46%, while T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a volatility of 20.77%. This indicates that AAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AAPXNVDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.46%

20.77%

-9.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.63%

51.84%

-21.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.15%

82.26%

-19.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.31%

96.89%

-41.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.31%

96.89%

-41.58%