TSLS vs. SMCZ
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSLS is passively managed, while SMCZ is actively managed. Over the past year, TSLS returned -29.14% vs -91.81% for SMCZ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMCZ.
Performance
TSLS vs. SMCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than SMCZ's -91.11% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- 1Y
- -29.14%
- 3Y*
- -38.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCZ
- 1D
- -14.09%
- 1M
- -81.22%
- YTD
- -91.11%
- 6M
- -89.47%
- 1Y
- -91.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLS vs. SMCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.03% | -51.82% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -91.11% | -61.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and SMCZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. SMCZ — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
SMCZ
TSLS vs. SMCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLS | SMCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | -0.59 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | -1.12 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.86 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -1.01 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | -2.05 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLS | SMCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | -0.59 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.58 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. SMCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, smaller than the maximum SMCZ drawdown of -97.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and SMCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | SMCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -97.40% | +6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.42% | -91.74% | +45.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.61% | -97.40% | +7.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -75.64% | +12.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.75% | 45.02% | -12.27% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. SMCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) is 12.05%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a volatility of 77.95%. This indicates that TSLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | SMCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 77.95% | -65.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 131.14% | -103.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.68% | 156.54% | -109.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 163.32% | -104.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 163.32% | -104.53% |
TSLS vs. SMCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCZ's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. SMCZ - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than SMCZ's 22.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 22.85% | 2.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.39% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and SMCZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCZ has higher volatility (77.95%) compared to TSLS (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs SMCZ's -97.40%.
On 1-year performance, TSLS leads with -29.14% vs -91.81% for SMCZ. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, TSLS has been the lower-risk option at 12.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLS has performed better with a -29.14% return vs -91.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLS is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.
SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 22.85%, compared with 3.39% for TSLS.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 1.29% for SMCZ.
SMCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and SMCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer