SMCZ vs. AIPO
SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. SMCZ is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.55, they often move in opposite directions. SMCZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -90.14% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 52.03% return.
SMCZ
- 1D
- 10.93%
- 1M
- -77.87%
- YTD
- -90.14%
- 6M
- -87.78%
- 1Y
- -89.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 52.03%
- 6M
- 45.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -90.14% | 92.88% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 52.03% | 8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCZ and AIPO is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | -0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCZ vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
SMCZ
AIPO
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMCZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 2.36 | -2.93 |
Drawdowns
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.40% | -17.31% | -80.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.12% | -1.12% | -96.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.71% | -4.38% | -71.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.99% | — | — |
Volatility
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 80.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 131.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.87% | 34.09% | +122.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 163.39% | 34.09% | +129.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 163.39% | 34.09% | +129.30% |
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.59%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 20.59% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCZ and AIPO have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.
SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 20.59%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
SMCZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIPO is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for SMCZ and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer