SMCZ vs. AIPO
SMCZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while AIPO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. SMCZ is actively managed, while AIPO is passively managed. Over the past year, SMCZ returned -73.11% vs 46.89% for AIPO. Their -0.59 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SMCZ charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCZ achieves a -87.76% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 33.86% return.
SMCZ
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -31.27%
- 6M
- -85.93%
- YTD
- -87.76%
- 1Y
- -73.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -89.95%
AIPO
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- YTD
- 33.86%
- 1Y
- 46.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.27M | $38.04M | $47.00M | |
| $23.07M | $12.69M | $14.60M |
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | -87.76% | 78.94% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 33.86% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCZ and AIPO is -0.58, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | -0.59 |
The correlation between SMCZ and AIPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCZ vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
SMCZ
AIPO
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.22 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.93 | -2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 6.41 | -7.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCZ drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCZ and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.40% | -24.36% | -73.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.49% | -24.36% | -67.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.42% | -14.84% | -81.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.91% | -5.31% | -72.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.58% | 7.33% | +42.25% |
Volatility
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) has a higher volatility of 65.84% compared to Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) at 14.74%. This indicates that SMCZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCZ | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 65.84% | 14.74% | +51.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 160.74% | 29.87% | +130.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 178.69% | 37.61% | +141.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 175.68% | 37.27% | +138.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 175.68% | 37.27% | +138.41% |
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCZ has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCZ vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
SMCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.59%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% |
SMCZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF | 16.59% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCZ and AIPO have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCZ has higher volatility (65.84%) compared to AIPO (14.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCZ dropped -97.40% vs AIPO's -24.36%.
On 1-year performance, AIPO leads with 46.89% vs -73.11% for SMCZ. On fees, AIPO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, AIPO has been the lower-risk option at 14.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIPO has performed better with a 46.89% return vs -73.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AIPO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMCZ.
SMCZ has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
SMCZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AIPO is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for SMCZ and 0.69% for AIPO.
AIPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCZ and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer