PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLS vs. SFYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLS vs. SFYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly higher than SFYF's 8.48% return.


TSLS

1D
5.18%
1M
9.46%
YTD
12.45%
6M
21.31%
1Y
-18.80%
3Y*
-32.36%
5Y*
10Y*

SFYF

1D
-2.42%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
8.48%
6M
6.33%
1Y
34.24%
3Y*
32.23%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLS vs. SFYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares
12.45%-34.95%-55.71%-60.12%105.60%
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
8.48%30.00%44.62%56.80%-30.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLS and SFYF is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

-0.74

The correlation between TSLS and SFYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLS vs. SFYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLS
TSLS Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TSLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLS Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SFYF
SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLS vs. SFYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLSSFYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.30

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

2.27

-2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

7.28

-7.89

TSLS vs. SFYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the SFYF Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLS and SFYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLS vs. SFYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than SFYF's maximum drawdown of -56.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and SFYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLSSFYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.73%

-56.09%

-34.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.46%

-15.18%

-28.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.16%

-26.45%

-57.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.66%

-7.13%

-81.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.77%

-16.49%

-47.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.42%

4.72%

+25.70%

Volatility

TSLS vs. SFYF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) at 8.20%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLSSFYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.77%

8.20%

+5.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.37%

14.97%

+13.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.91%

19.70%

+25.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.68%

29.37%

+29.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.68%

30.69%

+27.99%

TSLS vs. SFYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYF's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLS vs. SFYF - Dividend Comparison

TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than SFYF's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
0.30%0.33%0.31%1.71%1.19%0.26%0.40%0.73%
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares
3.11%4.30%7.62%4.52%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLS and SFYF have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLS has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to SFYF (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs SFYF's -56.09%.

On 3-year performance, SFYF leads with 32.23% vs -32.36% for TSLS. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SFYF has been the lower-risk option at 8.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 32.23% return vs -32.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.

TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.30% for SFYF.

TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SFYF is Large Cap Growth Equities. TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.29% for SFYF.

SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLS and SFYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer