TSLS vs. SFYF
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Tesla Inc (--100%), while SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLS returned -38.35%/yr vs 36.71%/yr for SFYF. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SFYF.
Performance
TSLS vs. SFYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than SFYF's 15.84% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- 1Y
- -29.14%
- 3Y*
- -38.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYF
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 46.49%
- 3Y*
- 36.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLS vs. SFYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.03% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 100.52% |
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 15.84% | 30.00% | 44.62% | 56.80% | -28.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and SFYF is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | -0.73 |
The correlation between TSLS and SFYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. SFYF — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
SFYF
TSLS vs. SFYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLS | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | 2.50 | -3.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | 3.16 | -3.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.42 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 3.10 | -3.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 10.30 | -11.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLS | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 2.50 | -3.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.62 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. SFYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than SFYF's maximum drawdown of -56.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and SFYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -56.09% | -34.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.42% | -15.18% | -31.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | -26.45% | -57.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.61% | -0.83% | -88.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -16.59% | -46.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.75% | 4.57% | +28.18% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. SFYF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) at 5.47%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 5.47% | +6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 13.18% | +14.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.68% | 18.71% | +27.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 29.43% | +29.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 30.69% | +28.10% |
TSLS vs. SFYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. SFYF - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than SFYF's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 1.71% | 1.19% | 0.26% | 0.40% | 0.73% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.39% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and SFYF have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to SFYF (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs SFYF's -56.09%.
On 3-year performance, SFYF leads with 36.71% vs -38.35% for TSLS. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SFYF has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 36.71% return vs -38.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.
TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SFYF is Large Cap Growth Equities. TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.29% for SFYF.
SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and SFYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer