TSLS vs. SFYF
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Tesla Inc (--100%), while SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLS returned -32.36%/yr vs 32.23%/yr for SFYF. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SFYF.
Performance
TSLS vs. SFYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly higher than SFYF's 8.48% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- 5.18%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- -18.80%
- 3Y*
- -32.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYF
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 34.24%
- 3Y*
- 32.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLS vs. SFYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 12.45% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 105.60% |
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 8.48% | 30.00% | 44.62% | 56.80% | -30.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and SFYF is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | -0.74 |
The correlation between TSLS and SFYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. SFYF — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
SFYF
TSLS vs. SFYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLS | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.30 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 2.27 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 7.28 | -7.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. SFYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than SFYF's maximum drawdown of -56.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and SFYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -56.09% | -34.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.46% | -15.18% | -28.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | -26.45% | -57.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.66% | -7.13% | -81.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -16.49% | -47.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.42% | 4.72% | +25.70% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. SFYF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) at 8.20%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | SFYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.77% | 8.20% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.37% | 14.97% | +13.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.91% | 19.70% | +25.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.68% | 29.37% | +29.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.68% | 30.69% | +27.99% |
TSLS vs. SFYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. SFYF - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than SFYF's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 0.30% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 1.71% | 1.19% | 0.26% | 0.40% | 0.73% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.11% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and SFYF have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to SFYF (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs SFYF's -56.09%.
On 3-year performance, SFYF leads with 32.23% vs -32.36% for TSLS. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SFYF has been the lower-risk option at 8.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 32.23% return vs -32.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.30% for SFYF.
TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SFYF is Large Cap Growth Equities. TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.29% for SFYF.
SFYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and SFYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer