TSLS vs. SEF
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - TSLS tracks the Tesla Inc (--100%) while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLS returned -38.35%/yr vs -10.66%/yr for SEF. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
TSLS vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 7.71% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -8.56%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- -2.42%
- 1Y
- -29.14%
- 3Y*
- -38.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 2.29%
- 3Y*
- -10.66%
- 5Y*
- -5.46%
- 10Y*
- -11.60%
TSLS vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.03% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 100.52% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 7.71% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and SEF is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.35 |
The correlation between TSLS and SEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
SEF
TSLS vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLS | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | 0.16 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | 0.35 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 0.22 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 0.41 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLS | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 0.16 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | -0.49 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -96.51% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.42% | -9.72% | -36.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | -39.40% | -44.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.61% | -96.13% | +6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -82.71% | +19.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.75% | 5.13% | +27.62% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 12.05% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 2.92%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.05% | 2.92% | +9.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.72% | 10.83% | +16.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.68% | 14.30% | +32.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 17.96% | +40.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 20.52% | +38.27% |
TSLS vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, which matches SEF's 3.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.38% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.39% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and SEF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to SEF (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -10.66% vs -38.35% for TSLS. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -10.66% return vs -38.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 3.38% for SEF.
TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.95% for SEF.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer