TSLS vs. HLAL
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Tesla Inc (--100%), while HLAL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLS returned -32.36%/yr vs 19.26%/yr for HLAL. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. TSLS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
TSLS vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSLS having a 12.45% return and HLAL slightly higher at 12.94%.
TSLS
- 1D
- 5.18%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- YTD
- 12.45%
- 6M
- 21.31%
- 1Y
- -18.80%
- 3Y*
- -32.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HLAL
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 12.94%
- 6M
- 11.97%
- 1Y
- 34.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.31%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLS vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 12.45% | -34.95% | -55.71% | -60.12% | 105.60% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 12.94% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and HLAL is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | -0.60 |
The correlation between TSLS and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
HLAL
TSLS vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLS | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.43 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 3.38 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 14.57 | -15.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -33.57% | -57.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.46% | -10.20% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | -21.67% | -62.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.66% | -4.93% | -83.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -4.99% | -58.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.42% | 2.36% | +28.06% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) at 6.71%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.77% | 6.71% | +7.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.37% | 11.63% | +16.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.91% | 14.42% | +30.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.68% | 17.80% | +40.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.68% | 20.27% | +38.41% |
TSLS vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than HLAL's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares | 3.11% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLS and HLAL have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLS has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to HLAL (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 3-year performance, HLAL leads with 19.26% vs -32.36% for TSLS. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HLAL has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 19.26% return vs -32.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLS.
TSLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 0.47% for HLAL.
TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while HLAL is Large Cap Growth Equities. TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer