TSLS vs. CRSH
TSLS (Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Tesla, Inc. (-100% Daily), while CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. TSLS is passively managed, while CRSH is actively managed. Over the past year, TSLS returned -14.97% vs -6.08% for CRSH. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TSLS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
TSLS vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 33.30% return, which is significantly higher than CRSH's 26.66% return.
TSLS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 27.99%
- YTD
- 33.30%
- 1Y
- -14.97%
- 3Y*
- -27.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.22%
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 26.66%
- 1Y
- -6.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $424.74K | $328.09K | $368.71K | |
| $28.97M | $27.46M | $30.88M |
TSLS vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 33.30% | -34.95% | -64.98% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 26.66% | -13.40% | -52.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLS and CRSH is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TSLS and CRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLS vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
TSLS
CRSH
TSLS vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.01 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | -0.17 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | -0.26 | -0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLS vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.73% | -63.68% | -27.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.36% | -31.54% | -9.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.56% | -50.17% | -36.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.44% | -43.98% | -20.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.53% | 20.47% | +9.06% |
Volatility
TSLS vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 19.07% compared to YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) at 14.23%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLS | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.07% | 14.23% | +4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.98% | 26.57% | +7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.81% | 36.89% | +9.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.98% | 47.50% | +11.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.98% | 47.50% | +11.48% |
TSLS vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLS vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than CRSH's 75.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 75.02% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLS Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF | 2.36% | 4.30% | 7.62% | 4.52% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, TSLS and CRSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSLS has higher volatility (19.07%) compared to CRSH (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs CRSH's -63.68%.
On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -6.08% vs -14.97% for TSLS. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 14.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -6.08% return vs -14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 75.02%, compared with 2.36% for TSLS.
TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CRSH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSLS and 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLS and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer