PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLS vs. CRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLS vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 33.30% return, which is significantly higher than CRSH's 26.66% return.


TSLS

1D
-0.74%
1M
22.65%
6M
27.99%
YTD
33.30%
1Y
-14.97%
3Y*
-27.51%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-25.22%

CRSH

1D
-0.93%
1M
17.65%
6M
21.15%
YTD
26.66%
1Y
-6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-25.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$424.74K$328.09K$368.71K
$28.97M$27.46M$30.88M

TSLS vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
33.30%-34.95%-64.98%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
26.66%-13.40%-52.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLS and CRSH is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024

0.96

The correlation between TSLS and CRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLS vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSLS
TSLS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TSLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSLS vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLSCRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.01

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

-0.17

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

-0.26

-0.19

TSLS vs. CRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the CRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLS and CRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLS vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and CRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLSCRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.73%

-63.68%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.36%

-31.54%

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.56%

-50.17%

-36.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.44%

-43.98%

-20.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.53%

20.47%

+9.06%

Volatility

TSLS vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF (TSLS) has a higher volatility of 19.07% compared to YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) at 14.23%. This indicates that TSLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLSCRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.07%

14.23%

+4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.98%

26.57%

+7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.81%

36.89%

+9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.98%

47.50%

+11.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.98%

47.50%

+11.48%

TSLS vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLS vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison

TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than CRSH's 75.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
75.02%138.78%94.25%0.00%0.00%
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
2.36%4.30%7.62%4.52%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, TSLS and CRSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSLS has higher volatility (19.07%) compared to CRSH (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs CRSH's -63.68%.

On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -6.08% vs -14.97% for TSLS. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 14.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -6.08% return vs -14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLS is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 75.02%, compared with 2.36% for TSLS.

TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CRSH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSLS and 0.99% for CRSH.

CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLS and CRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer