TSLR vs. SMYY
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and SMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while SMYY is a Options Trading fund managed by GraniteShares. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLR charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for SMYY.
Performance
TSLR vs. SMYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly lower than SMYY's 6.70% return.
TSLR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.05%
- 6M
- -20.52%
- 1Y
- 8.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMYY
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- -8.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR vs. SMYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.05% | -5.82% |
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 6.70% | -27.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and SMYY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. SMYY — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
SMYY
TSLR vs. SMYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF (SMYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLR | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLR | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -0.98 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. SMYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than SMYY's maximum drawdown of -36.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and SMYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -36.84% | -45.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.09% | -28.74% | -30.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.24% | -25.15% | -25.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.45% | — | — |
Volatility
TSLR vs. SMYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | SMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.75% | 32.69% | +60.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 32.69% | +82.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 32.69% | +82.85% |
TSLR vs. SMYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLR vs. SMYY - Dividend Comparison
TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 146.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SMCI ETF | 146.89% | 53.33% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLR and SMYY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMYY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMYY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
SMYY has the higher dividend yield at 146.89%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
TSLR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SMYY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 1.07% for SMYY.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and SMYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer