TSLR vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLR returned 8.94% vs 20.52% for QTJL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLR charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

TSLR vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.15% return.

TSLR

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 13.88%
• YTD: -20.05%
• 6M: -20.52%
• 1Y: 8.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLR vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF	-20.05%	-25.97%	67.57%	1.69%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.15%	21.07%	16.50%	11.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and QTJL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023	0.57

The correlation between TSLR and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSLR vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSLR	QTJL
Consumer Cyclical	66.6%	12.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Communication Services	-	15.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.6%
Energy	-	0.6%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	54.2%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

TSLR vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR

TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 12
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLR	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	2.06	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	2.93	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.42	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.17	3.08	-2.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	16.23	-15.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLR vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLR	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10	2.06	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.52	-0.52

Drawdowns

TSLR vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLR	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.80%	-33.40%	-49.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.37%	-6.68%	-47.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.09%	-0.01%	-59.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.24%	-7.94%	-42.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.45%	1.27%	+25.18%

Volatility

TSLR vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 24.40% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLR	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.40%	0.31%	+24.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.65%	7.61%	+47.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.75%	10.01%	+82.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	115.54%	20.42%	+95.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	115.54%	20.42%	+95.12%

TSLR vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLR vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSLR nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLR and QTJL in my portfolio?

TSLR and QTJL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLR or QTJL?

TSLR has higher volatility (24.40%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, TSLR or QTJL?

On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 20.52% vs 8.94% for TSLR. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLR or QTJL?

Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 20.52% return vs 8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLR or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLR or QTJL?

TSLR and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TSLR and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.