TSLR vs. NVD
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLR returned 8.94% vs -67.15% for NVD. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLR vs. NVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -20.05% return, which is significantly higher than NVD's -34.83% return.
TSLR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.05%
- 6M
- -20.52%
- 1Y
- 8.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVD
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- -18.10%
- YTD
- -34.83%
- 6M
- -40.44%
- 1Y
- -67.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.05% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -34.83% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and NVD is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | -0.34 |
TSLR vs. NVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSLR
NVD
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSLR
NVD
-
Basic Materials
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Communication Services
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Consumer Defensive
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Energy
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Financial Services
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Healthcare
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Industrials
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Real Estate
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Technology
TSLR
-
NVD
Utilities
TSLR
-
NVD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
NVD
TSLR vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLR | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.81 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | -0.93 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | -1.41 | +1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLR | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | -0.98 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | -0.87 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and NVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -99.26% | +16.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | -72.64% | +18.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.09% | -99.12% | +40.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.24% | -81.65% | +31.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.45% | 47.63% | -21.18% |
Volatility
TSLR vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) is 24.40%, while GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a volatility of 26.02%. This indicates that TSLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | NVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.40% | 26.02% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.65% | 52.01% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.75% | 68.60% | +24.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 92.60% | +22.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.54% | 92.60% | +22.94% |
TSLR vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLR and NVD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
TSLR vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison
TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 18.15% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLR and NVD have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (26.02%) compared to TSLR (24.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs NVD's -99.26%.
On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with 8.94% vs -67.15% for NVD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLR has been the lower-risk option at 24.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a 8.94% return vs -67.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLR and NVD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.15%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
TSLR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVD is Inverse Equities.
TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and NVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer