TSLQ vs. QID
TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) and QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while QID is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%). TSLQ is actively managed, while QID is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLQ returned -64.10%/yr vs -37.09%/yr for QID. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLQ charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QID.
Performance
TSLQ vs. QID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than QID's -27.39% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- 11.57%
- 1M
- 18.36%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 31.99%
- 1Y
- -49.38%
- 3Y*
- -64.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QID
- 1D
- 6.66%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- -27.39%
- 6M
- -25.36%
- 1Y
- -44.49%
- 3Y*
- -37.09%
- 5Y*
- -30.38%
- 10Y*
- -39.07%
TSLQ vs. QID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 13.60% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -59.97% | 61.04% |
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | -27.39% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -57.19% | 3.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and QID is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.60 |
The correlation between TSLQ and QID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. QID — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
QID
TSLQ vs. QID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLQ | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.78 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.95 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | -1.90 | +1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. QID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum QID drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and QID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -99.99% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.21% | -46.92% | -25.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | -79.50% | -18.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.31% | -99.99% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.61% | -87.02% | +19.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.23% | 25.43% | +30.80% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. QID - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 27.76% compared to ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) at 17.88%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | QID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.76% | 17.88% | +9.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.68% | 28.91% | +27.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.33% | 35.84% | +53.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.31% | 45.36% | +48.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.31% | 44.78% | +49.53% |
TSLQ vs. QID - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than QID's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. QID - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than QID's 7.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 7.15% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 9.30% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and QID have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (27.76%) compared to QID (17.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs QID's -99.99%.
On 3-year performance, QID leads with -37.09% vs -64.10% for TSLQ. On fees, QID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 17.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QID has performed better with a -37.09% return vs -64.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.30%, compared with 7.15% for QID.
TSLQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QID is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.95% for QID.
TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and QID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer