TSLQ vs. QID

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) and QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while QID is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%). TSLQ is actively managed, while QID is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLQ returned -68.13%/yr vs -39.46%/yr for QID. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLQ charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QID.

Performance

TSLQ vs. QID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly higher than QID's -32.38% return.

TSLQ

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: -18.02%
• YTD: -3.80%
• 6M: -15.12%
• 1Y: -62.78%
• 3Y*: -68.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QID

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -18.30%
• YTD: -32.38%
• 6M: -30.52%
• 1Y: -49.85%
• 3Y*: -39.46%
• 5Y*: -33.04%
• 10Y*: -38.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLQ vs. QID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF	-3.80%	-74.67%	-83.21%	-59.97%	63.52%
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ	-32.38%	-34.97%	-34.06%	-57.19%	4.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLQ and QID is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022	0.59

The correlation between TSLQ and QID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLQ vs. QID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLQ

TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QID

QID Risk / Return Rank: 0
QID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QID Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QID Omega Ratio Rank: 0
QID Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
QID Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLQ vs. QID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLQ	QID	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	-1.57	+0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.86	-2.68	+1.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	0.72	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	-1.02	+0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.04	-2.02	+0.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLQ vs. QID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is higher than the QID Sharpe Ratio of -1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLQ and QID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLQ	QID	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68	-1.57	+0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.65	-0.81	+0.16

Drawdowns

TSLQ vs. QID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum QID drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and QID.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLQ	QID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.73%	-99.99%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.93%	-49.58%	-26.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.85%	-79.41%	-18.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-88.67%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.57%	-99.99%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.15%	-87.00%	+19.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	59.46%	25.07%	+34.39%

Volatility

TSLQ vs. QID - Volatility Comparison

AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) at 8.98%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLQ	QID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.08%	8.98%	+15.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.84%	24.28%	+30.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.72%	31.93%	+60.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.16%	44.78%	+49.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.16%	44.55%	+49.61%

TSLQ vs. QID - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLQ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QID's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLQ vs. QID - Dividend Comparison

TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.98%, more than QID's 7.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ	7.68%	6.25%	7.99%	5.63%	0.15%	0.00%	0.92%	2.54%	1.38%	0.08%
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF	10.98%	10.56%	4.95%	13.35%	2.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLQ and QID in my portfolio?

TSLQ and QID have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLQ or QID?

TSLQ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to QID (8.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs QID's -99.99%.

Which ETF is better, TSLQ or QID?

On 3-year performance, QID leads with -39.46% vs -68.13% for TSLQ. On fees, QID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 8.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLQ or QID?

Over the 3-year period, QID has performed better with a -39.46% return vs -68.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLQ or QID?

QID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLQ or QID?

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.98%, compared with 7.68% for QID.

What is the main difference between TSLQ and QID?

TSLQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QID is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSLQ and 0.95% for QID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.