TSLQ vs. CRSH
TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLQ returned -49.80% vs -8.28% for CRSH. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TSLQ charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
TSLQ vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 38.93% return, which is significantly higher than CRSH's 23.69% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- -6.90%
- 1M
- 35.06%
- 6M
- 26.09%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- -49.80%
- 3Y*
- -61.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -55.33%
CRSH
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- YTD
- 23.69%
- 1Y
- -8.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $453.60K | $342.77K | $370.28K | |
| $162.37M | $140.91M | $160.99M |
TSLQ vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 38.93% | -74.67% | -86.78% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 23.69% | -13.40% | -52.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and CRSH is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TSLQ and CRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
CRSH
TSLQ vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLQ | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.99 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.27 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -0.43 | -0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than CRSH's maximum drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -63.68% | -35.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.10% | -30.50% | -37.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.93% | -51.34% | -46.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.45% | -43.99% | -24.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.92% | 20.48% | +35.44% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 36.02% compared to YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) at 13.43%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.02% | 13.43% | +22.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.36% | 26.57% | +40.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.80% | 36.90% | +55.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.65% | 47.48% | +48.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.65% | 47.48% | +48.17% |
TSLQ vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, less than CRSH's 76.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 76.82% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.60% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, TSLQ and CRSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSLQ has higher volatility (36.02%) compared to CRSH (13.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs CRSH's -63.68%.
On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -8.28% vs -49.80% for TSLQ. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 13.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -8.28% return vs -49.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 76.82%, compared with 7.60% for TSLQ.
TSLQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CRSH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer