PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSGAX vs. TCGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSGAX vs. TCGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Strategic Growth Fund (TSGAX) and Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund (TCGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSGAX achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than TCGAX's 6.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TSGAX has outperformed TCGAX with an annualized return of 5.39%, while TCGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.


TSGAX

1D
1.06%
1M
0.17%
6M
4.36%
YTD
7.89%
1Y
13.41%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
4.18%
10Y*
5.39%
ALL TIME*
2.91%

TCGAX

1D
0.51%
1M
0.68%
6M
3.80%
YTD
6.43%
1Y
11.05%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
4.07%
ALL TIME*
3.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TSGAX vs. TCGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSGAX
Timothy Plan Strategic Growth Fund
7.89%12.94%6.01%7.66%-13.69%11.67%8.13%18.84%-12.29%11.54%
TCGAX
Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund
6.43%10.54%4.29%6.59%-12.86%7.61%7.71%14.78%-9.25%8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TSGAX and TCGAX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2000

0.91

The correlation between TSGAX and TCGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSGAX vs. TCGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSGAX
TSGAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TSGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TSGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

TCGAX
TCGAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TCGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TCGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSGAX vs. TCGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Strategic Growth Fund (TSGAX) and Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund (TCGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSGAXTCGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.90

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

7.06

-0.02

TSGAX vs. TCGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the TCGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSGAX and TCGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSGAX vs. TCGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSGAX drawdown since its inception was -54.36%, which is greater than TCGAX's maximum drawdown of -40.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSGAX and TCGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSGAXTCGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.36%

-40.54%

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

-5.57%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.10%

-7.75%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

-17.77%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.47%

-20.35%

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

0.00%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-6.24%

-5.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.50%

+0.25%

Volatility

TSGAX vs. TCGAX - Volatility Comparison

Timothy Plan Strategic Growth Fund (TSGAX) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund (TCGAX) at 1.57%. This indicates that TSGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TCGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSGAXTCGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

1.57%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

5.76%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.59%

7.34%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.27%

7.82%

+2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.36%

8.34%

+3.02%

TSGAX vs. TCGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSGAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than TCGAX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSGAX vs. TCGAX - Dividend Comparison

TSGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, which matches TCGAX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TCGAX
Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund
1.08%1.14%3.45%1.65%5.35%4.01%2.56%3.64%2.47%0.31%0.00%7.45%
TSGAX
Timothy Plan Strategic Growth Fund
1.08%1.17%3.33%1.57%7.33%4.70%3.40%3.72%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, TSGAX and TCGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSGAX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to TCGAX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSGAX dropped -54.36% vs TCGAX's -40.54%.

TCGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSGAX and TCGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer