TSCM vs. FCUS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and FCUS (Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FCUS.

Performance

TSCM vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 43.18% return.

TSCM

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCUS

• 1D: -3.77%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 43.18%
• 6M: 40.26%
• 1Y: 87.27%
• 3Y*: 34.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCM vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	2.68%	-1.32%
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	43.18%	-1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCM and FCUS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

TSCM vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 78
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCM vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSCM	FCUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.46	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.12	—

Drawdowns

TSCM vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and FCUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCM	FCUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.87%	-39.89%	+25.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.70%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-4.59%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-7.51%	+1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSCM	FCUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.35%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.15%	35.63%	-14.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.15%	30.33%	-9.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.15%	30.33%	-9.18%

TSCM vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCM vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison

TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	3.02%	4.33%	11.19%
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCM and FCUS in my portfolio?

TSCM and FCUS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSCM or FCUS?

On fees, TSCM is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSCM or FCUS?

TSCM is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSCM or FCUS?

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.

What is the main difference between TSCM and FCUS?

They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.79% for FCUS.