TSCM vs. BSMR
TSCM (TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF) and BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSCM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TimesSquare Capital Management, while BSMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2027 Index. TSCM is actively managed, while BSMR is passively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSCM charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMR.
Performance
TSCM vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCM achieves a 3.31% return, which is significantly higher than BSMR's 1.04% return.
TSCM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMR
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 4.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- —
TSCM vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 3.31% | -0.86% |
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.04% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCM and BSMR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCM vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank
TSCM
BSMR
TSCM vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF (TSCM) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCM | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.22 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
TSCM vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCM drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, which is greater than BSMR's maximum drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCM and BSMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCM | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.87% | -13.49% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -3.49% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
TSCM vs. BSMR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCM | BSMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 1.25% | +19.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 3.03% | +18.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 5.72% | +15.31% |
TSCM vs. BSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSCM has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMR's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSCM vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison
TSCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.72% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.72% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 1.49% | 0.45% |
TSCM TimesSquare Quality Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCM and BSMR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TSCM.
BSMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 0.00% for TSCM.
TSCM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while BSMR is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: TimesSquare Capital Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TSCM and 0.18% for BSMR.
Find the right allocation for TSCM and BSMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer