PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSCGX vs. VISGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSCGX vs. VISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCGX achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than VISGX's 15.02% return.


TSCGX

1D
2.73%
1M
-2.24%
6M
13.56%
YTD
18.93%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.34%

VISGX

1D
1.86%
1M
-3.22%
6M
10.42%
YTD
15.02%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
10.77%
ALL TIME*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TSCGX vs. VISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TSCGX
Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund
18.93%1.84%10.83%9.90%-22.54%11.30%55.07%30.05%-11.15%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
15.02%8.18%14.80%22.91%-28.50%5.58%35.11%32.60%-10.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCGX and VISGX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2018

0.90

The correlation between TSCGX and VISGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSCGX vs. VISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSCGX
TSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VISGX
VISGX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSCGX vs. VISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSCGXVISGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.23

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

7.50

-0.93

TSCGX vs. VISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the VISGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCGX and VISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSCGX vs. VISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCGX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum VISGX drawdown of -58.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCGX and VISGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSCGXVISGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.84%

-58.74%

+19.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-11.39%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.59%

-27.58%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.84%

-38.41%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.54%

-5.21%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-11.56%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.38%

+0.33%

Volatility

TSCGX vs. VISGX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund (VISGX) at 5.53%. This indicates that TSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSCGXVISGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

5.53%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

16.08%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.55%

20.71%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

23.76%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

23.04%

+1.37%

TSCGX vs. VISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VISGX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSCGX vs. VISGX - Dividend Comparison

TSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than VISGX's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TSCGX
Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund
0.78%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.39%2.20%0.50%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VISGX
Vanguard Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.32%0.33%0.42%0.56%0.46%0.23%0.35%0.47%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TSCGX and VISGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSCGX has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to VISGX (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCGX dropped -38.84% vs VISGX's -58.74%.

VISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSCGX and VISGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer