TSCGX vs. CTSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSCGX (Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund) and CTSIX (Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, TSCGX returned 4.04%/yr vs 11.14%/yr for CTSIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSCGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CTSIX.

Performance

TSCGX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSCGX achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 35.59% return.

TSCGX

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: 8.48%
• YTD: 18.27%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 27.60%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: —

CTSIX

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: 11.15%
• YTD: 35.59%
• 6M: 35.33%
• 1Y: 68.24%
• 3Y*: 35.13%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSCGX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	18.27%	1.84%	10.83%	9.90%	-22.54%	11.30%	55.07%	6.32%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	35.59%	25.90%	44.34%	7.57%	-37.30%	9.12%	63.38%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TSCGX and CTSIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019	0.90

The correlation between TSCGX and CTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSCGX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSCGX

TSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 34
TSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

CTSIX

CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSCGX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSCGX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.52	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.18	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.40	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	5.65	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	23.22	-14.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSCGX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSCGX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSCGX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.52	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.40	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.57	-0.14

Drawdowns

TSCGX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSCGX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCGX and CTSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSCGX	CTSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.84%	-50.83%	+11.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-12.38%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.59%	-28.40%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.84%	-50.60%	+11.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.09%	-20.64%	+7.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	3.00%	+0.35%

Volatility

TSCGX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund (TSCGX) is 6.33%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that TSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSCGX	CTSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	9.40%	-3.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	21.29%	-6.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.10%	27.70%	-8.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	28.00%	-4.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.45%	29.78%	-5.33%

TSCGX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSCGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSCGX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

TSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.77%	4.95%	0.00%
TSCGX Thrivent Small Cap Growth Fund	0.73%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.39%	2.20%	0.50%	2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSCGX and CTSIX in my portfolio?

TSCGX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSCGX or CTSIX?

CTSIX has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to TSCGX (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCGX dropped -38.84% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.