TRUT vs. NLR
TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VanEck, while NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. TRUT is actively managed, while NLR is passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
TRUT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 6.14% return.
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- -4.59%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 36.84%
- 3Y*
- 35.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
TRUT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 6.14% | 15.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUT and NLR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
TRUT
NLR
TRUT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRUT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.18 | +2.22 |
Drawdowns
TRUT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.55% | -65.05% | +46.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -19.80% | +18.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -35.72% | +30.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.61% | — |
Volatility
TRUT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.53% | 42.32% | -20.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 29.24% | -7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 24.02% | -2.49% |
TRUT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than NLR's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.40% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUT and NLR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
TRUT is categorized as Technology Equities, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.56% for NLR.
Find the right allocation for TRUT and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer