TRUO vs. RSPS
TRUO (VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF) and RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRUO charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPS.
Performance
TRUO vs. RSPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUO
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPS
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 4.80%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.24%
TRUO vs. RSPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUO VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF | 2.47% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 5.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUO and RSPS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUO vs. RSPS — Risk / Return Rank
TRUO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPS
TRUO vs. RSPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF (TRUO) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUO | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.07 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUO vs. RSPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUO drawdown since its inception was -3.45%, smaller than the maximum RSPS drawdown of -35.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUO and RSPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUO | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -35.93% | +32.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -5.75% | +4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -5.06% | +3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.67% | — |
Volatility
TRUO vs. RSPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUO | RSPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.53% | 14.60% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 13.86% | +5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 14.96% | +4.57% |
TRUO vs. RSPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUO has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUO vs. RSPS - Dividend Comparison
TRUO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.88% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
TRUO VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, TRUO and RSPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TRUO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.00% for TRUO.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TRUO and 0.40% for RSPS.
Find the right allocation for TRUO and RSPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer