TRUO vs. FSTA

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

TRUO (VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF) and FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRUO charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FSTA.

Performance

TRUO vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF (TRUO) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TRUO

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSTA

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 2.84%
• YTD: 9.55%
• 6M: 8.63%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: 8.02%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: 7.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUO vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TRUO VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF	1.76%
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUO and FSTA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	0.92

Return for Risk

TRUO vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRUO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FSTA

FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 17
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 16
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUO vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF (TRUO) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRUO	FSTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.10	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.76	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.47	—

Drawdowns

TRUO vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUO drawdown since its inception was -3.40%, smaller than the maximum FSTA drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUO and FSTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUO	FSTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-25.13%	+21.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.29%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-5.30%	+3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.03%	-3.56%	+2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUO	FSTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.40%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.22%	12.76%	+4.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	13.18%	+4.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.22%	14.58%	+2.64%

TRUO vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUO has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRUO vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison

TRUO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	2.18%	2.34%	2.25%	2.66%	2.26%	2.15%	2.47%	2.46%	3.01%	2.42%	2.53%	2.86%
TRUO VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUO and FSTA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, TRUO and FSTA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, TRUO or FSTA?

On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUO or FSTA?

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for TRUO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUO or FSTA?

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.00% for TRUO.

What is the main difference between TRUO and FSTA?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TRUO and 0.08% for FSTA.