TRUF vs. GDXJ
TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUF is a Financials Equities fund managed by VanEck, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
TRUF vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -17.08%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -13.09%
- 1Y
- 54.50%
- 3Y*
- 43.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
TRUF vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 10.01% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUF and GDXJ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUF vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDXJ
TRUF vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUF | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUF vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUF | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -88.66% | +85.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -36.67% | +35.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -60.38% | +59.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.79% | — |
Volatility
TRUF vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUF | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 44.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 52.64% | -39.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 41.76% | -28.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 44.33% | -31.16% |
TRUF vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUF vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
TRUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.68% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUF and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.00% for TRUF.
TRUF is categorized as Financials Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.52% for GDXJ.
Find the right allocation for TRUF and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer