TRUC vs. NLR
TRUC (VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUC is a Communications Equities fund managed by VanEck, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRUC charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
TRUC vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUC
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -17.23%
- 6M
- -29.26%
- YTD
- -15.40%
- 1Y
- -8.06%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.20%
TRUC vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUC VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF | 1.58% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -27.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUC and NLR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUC vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
TRUC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NLR
TRUC vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF (TRUC) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUC | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.00 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUC vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUC drawdown since its inception was -11.47%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUC and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUC | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.47% | -65.05% | +53.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -36.08% | +29.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -35.67% | +32.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.20% | — |
Volatility
TRUC vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUC | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.89% | 43.18% | -23.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 29.88% | -9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 24.43% | -4.54% |
TRUC vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUC has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRUC vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
TRUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than NLR's 3.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 3.01% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
TRUC VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUC and NLR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUC is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUC is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.23% for TRUC.
TRUC is categorized as Communications Equities, while NLR is Uranium. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TRUC and 0.56% for NLR.
Find the right allocation for TRUC and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer