TRUC vs. GOLS

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

TRUC (VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF) and GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUC charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GOLS.

Performance

TRUC vs. GOLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF (TRUC) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TRUC

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: -7.33%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GOLS

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUC vs. GOLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TRUC VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF	-1.06%
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF	3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUC and GOLS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.69

Return for Risk

TRUC vs. GOLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Communication Services TruSector ETF (TRUC) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

TRUC vs. GOLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUC drawdown since its inception was -11.47%, which is greater than GOLS's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUC and GOLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUC	GOLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.47%	-7.85%	-3.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.29%	-1.10%	-8.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-1.99%	-1.21%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUC	GOLS	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.79%	13.95%	+5.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	13.95%	+5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.79%	13.95%	+5.84%

TRUC vs. GOLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUC has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLS's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRUC vs. GOLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TRUC nor GOLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUC and GOLS in my portfolio?

TRUC and GOLS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRUC or GOLS?

On fees, TRUC is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUC or GOLS?

TRUC is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUC or GOLS?

TRUC and GOLS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TRUC and GOLS?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for TRUC and 0.90% for GOLS.