PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTY vs. BSR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRTY vs. BSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than BSR's 2.77% return.


TRTY

1D
-1.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
6.97%
6M
6.31%
1Y
19.33%
3Y*
10.40%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*

BSR

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
2.77%
6M
2.04%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTY vs. BSR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
6.97%16.35%3.89%4.26%
BSR
Beacon Selective Risk ETF
2.77%4.21%12.44%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTY and BSR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023

0.75

The correlation between TRTY and BSR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTY vs. BSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTY
TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BSR
BSR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSR Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTY vs. BSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRTYBSRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.21

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

1.70

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.89

4.57

+9.32

TRTY vs. BSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the BSR Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTY and BSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRTY vs. BSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, which is greater than BSR's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and BSR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTYBSRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-15.68%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.49%

-6.15%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

-15.68%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.45%

-4.99%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-4.58%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.29%

-0.90%

Volatility

TRTY vs. BSR - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) at 2.41%. This indicates that TRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTYBSRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

2.41%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

6.52%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.05%

8.79%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

16.17%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.43%

16.17%

-5.74%

TRTY vs. BSR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than BSR's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRTY vs. BSR - Dividend Comparison

TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than BSR's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BSR
Beacon Selective Risk ETF
2.82%2.89%0.89%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRTY
Cambria Trinity ETF
3.10%2.86%3.55%3.24%5.17%4.52%1.99%2.64%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRTY and BSR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRTY has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to BSR (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTY dropped -22.35% vs BSR's -15.68%.

On 3-year performance, TRTY leads with 10.40% vs 7.09% for BSR. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, BSR has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRTY has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for BSR.

TRTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.82% for BSR.

TRTY tracks Cambria Trinity Index, while BSR tracks NONE. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 1.10% for BSR.

TRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTY and BSR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer