PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTN-PA vs. FKURF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) and Fujikura Ltd (FKURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTN-PA achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than FKURF's -58.41% return.


TRTN-PA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.04%
YTD
3.86%
6M
3.93%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
8.88%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*

FKURF

1D
22.76%
1M
42.99%
YTD
-58.41%
6M
-58.68%
1Y
-8.38%
3Y*
75.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TRTN-PA
Triton International Ltd
3.86%9.17%10.10%2.07%
FKURF
Fujikura Ltd
-58.41%147.24%480.56%-8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTN-PA and FKURF is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023

0.04

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTN-PA
TRTN-PA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FKURF
FKURF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FKURF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKURF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKURF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FKURF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKURF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) and Fujikura Ltd (FKURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRTN-PAFKURFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.34

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

-0.10

+3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

-0.20

+13.27

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the FKURF Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTN-PA and FKURF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTN-PA drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum FKURF drawdown of -87.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTN-PA and FKURF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTN-PAFKURFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-87.49%

+30.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-87.49%

+84.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.94%

-87.49%

+84.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-78.37%

+77.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-13.25%

+10.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

41.00%

-40.22%

Volatility

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) is 1.84%, while Fujikura Ltd (FKURF) has a volatility of 39.96%. This indicates that TRTN-PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKURF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTN-PAFKURFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.84%

39.96%

-38.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.21%

199.64%

-194.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

129.81%

-122.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.81%

94.85%

-86.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

94.85%

-73.56%

Dividends

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF - Dividend Comparison

TRTN-PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, while FKURF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FKURF
Fujikura Ltd
0.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRTN-PA
Triton International Ltd
8.32%8.30%8.33%8.45%8.43%7.75%7.81%5.80%

Financials

TRTN-PA vs. FKURF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Triton International Ltd and Fujikura Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


350.00M400.00M450.00M20222023202420252026
331.25M
(TRTN-PA) Total Revenue
(FKURF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRTN-PA and FKURF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKURF has higher volatility (39.96%) compared to TRTN-PA (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTN-PA dropped -57.11% vs FKURF's -87.49%.

TRTN-PA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTN-PA and FKURF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer