FKURF vs. FSELX
FKURF (Fujikura Ltd) is a stock, while FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) is Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, FKURF returned 42.81%/yr vs 50.94%/yr for FSELX. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FKURF vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FKURF achieves a -76.93% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 48.22% return.
FKURF
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -29.19%
- 6M
- -81.00%
- YTD
- -76.93%
- 1Y
- -65.98%
- 3Y*
- 42.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 42.08%
FSELX
- 1D
- 7.17%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- 6M
- 32.88%
- YTD
- 48.22%
- 1Y
- 83.24%
- 3Y*
- 50.94%
- 5Y*
- 38.34%
- 10Y*
- 35.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.72%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FKURF Fujikura Ltd | $1.31M | $920.83K | $912.25K |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FKURF vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FKURF Fujikura Ltd | -76.93% | 147.24% | 480.56% | -8.86% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 48.22% | 52.17% | 49.68% | 15.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FKURF and FSELX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FKURF vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank
FKURF
FSELX
FKURF vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fujikura Ltd (FKURF) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FKURF | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.31 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 2.90 | -3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 12.21 | -13.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FKURF vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FKURF drawdown since its inception was -89.20%, which is greater than FSELX's maximum drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKURF and FSELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKURF | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.20% | -82.54% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.20% | -26.87% | -62.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.20% | -36.31% | -52.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.00% | -21.63% | -66.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.79% | -28.63% | +12.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.76% | 6.37% | +43.39% |
Volatility
FKURF vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison
Fujikura Ltd (FKURF) has a higher volatility of 26.15% compared to Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) at 16.75%. This indicates that FKURF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FKURF | FSELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.15% | 16.75% | +9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 202.27% | 34.43% | +167.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.83% | 40.79% | +93.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.42% | 40.42% | +55.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.42% | 35.84% | +59.58% |
Dividends
FKURF vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison
FKURF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKURF Fujikura Ltd | 0.00% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 11.05% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FKURF and FSELX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FKURF has higher volatility (26.15%) compared to FSELX (16.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKURF dropped -89.20% vs FSELX's -82.54%.
FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FKURF and FSELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer