PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CODX vs. RTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CODX vs. RTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) and Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CODX achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than RTX's -5.21% return.


CODX

1D
-16.88%
1M
229.30%
YTD
2.21%
6M
-51.67%
1Y
-39.26%
3Y*
-45.93%
5Y*
-54.03%
10Y*

RTX

1D
-0.98%
1M
0.21%
YTD
-5.21%
6M
3.20%
1Y
27.49%
3Y*
24.15%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
15.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CODX vs. RTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CODX
Co-Diagnostics, Inc.
2.21%-77.52%-43.61%-47.22%-71.78%-3.98%939.11%-39.93%-43.56%-54.56%
RTX
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
-5.21%61.44%40.76%-14.44%20.01%23.27%-7.70%43.82%-14.66%4.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CODX and RTX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CODX:

$6.88M

RTX:

$235.46B

EPS

CODX:

-$38.06

RTX:

$5.34

PS Ratio

CODX:

10.23

RTX:

2.60

PB Ratio

CODX:

0.33

RTX:

3.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

CODX:

$622.49K

RTX:

$90.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CODX:

$400.11K

RTX:

$18.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

CODX:

-$47.41M

RTX:

$13.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CODX vs. RTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CODX
CODX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CODX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CODX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CODX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CODX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CODX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RTX
RTX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CODX vs. RTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) and Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CODXRTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

1.17

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

1.78

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.22

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

1.43

-1.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.57

4.12

-4.69

CODX vs. RTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CODX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the RTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CODX and RTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CODXRTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

1.17

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

0.71

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.43

-0.63

Drawdowns

CODX vs. RTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CODX drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than RTX's maximum drawdown of -55.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CODX and RTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CODXRTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.86%

-55.14%

-44.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.60%

-19.32%

-77.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.68%

-29.92%

-67.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.62%

-32.84%

-66.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.44%

-18.33%

-81.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.54%

-13.03%

-63.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

68.94%

6.68%

+62.26%

Volatility

CODX vs. RTX - Volatility Comparison

Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) has a higher volatility of 122.80% compared to Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTX) at 6.51%. This indicates that CODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CODXRTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

122.80%

6.51%

+116.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

188.76%

17.45%

+171.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

349.97%

23.65%

+326.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

172.26%

23.79%

+148.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

171.74%

27.71%

+144.03%

Dividends

CODX vs. RTX - Dividend Comparison

CODX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CODX
Co-Diagnostics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RTX
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
1.61%1.46%2.14%2.76%2.14%2.33%21.21%1.96%2.66%2.13%2.39%2.66%

Financials

CODX vs. RTX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Co-Diagnostics, Inc. and Raytheon Technologies Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
263.92K
22.08B
(CODX) Total Revenue
(RTX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CODX and RTX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CODX has higher volatility (122.80%) compared to RTX (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CODX dropped -99.86% vs RTX's -55.14%.

RTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CODX and RTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer