CODX vs. CRT
CODX (Co-Diagnostics, Inc.) and CRT (Cross Timbers Royalty Trust) are both stocks. CODX operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while CRT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, CODX returned -54.03%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for CRT. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CODX vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CODX achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 38.41% return.
CODX
- 1D
- -16.88%
- 1M
- 229.30%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -51.67%
- 1Y
- -39.26%
- 3Y*
- -45.93%
- 5Y*
- -54.03%
- 10Y*
- —
CRT
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 38.41%
- 6M
- 31.11%
- 1Y
- 16.07%
- 3Y*
- -14.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
CODX vs. CRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CODX Co-Diagnostics, Inc. | 2.21% | -77.52% | -43.61% | -47.22% | -71.78% | -3.98% | 939.11% | -39.93% | -43.56% | -54.56% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 38.41% | -13.15% | -39.15% | -24.36% | 145.90% | 53.31% | 5.38% | -13.04% | -17.93% | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CODX and CRT is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
CODX:
$6.88M
CRT:
$64.80M
CODX:
-$38.06
CRT:
$0.54
CODX:
10.23
CRT:
14.41
CODX:
0.33
CRT:
30.49
CODX:
$622.49K
CRT:
$4.50M
CODX:
$400.11K
CRT:
$4.33M
CODX:
-$47.41M
CRT:
$3.36M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CODX vs. CRT — Risk / Return Rank
CODX
CRT
CODX vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CODX | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.12 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 0.56 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 1.20 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CODX | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 0.53 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.21 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | 0.25 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
CODX vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CODX drawdown since its inception was -99.86%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CODX and CRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CODX | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.86% | -83.57% | -16.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.60% | -28.94% | -67.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.68% | -67.06% | -30.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.62% | -71.10% | -28.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.44% | -53.78% | -45.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.54% | -29.39% | -47.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.94% | 13.48% | +55.46% |
Volatility
CODX vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
Co-Diagnostics, Inc. (CODX) has a higher volatility of 122.80% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 5.76%. This indicates that CODX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CODX | CRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 122.80% | 5.76% | +117.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 188.76% | 22.90% | +165.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 349.97% | 30.49% | +319.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 172.26% | 50.47% | +121.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 171.74% | 46.02% | +125.72% |
Dividends
CODX vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
CODX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CODX Co-Diagnostics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 4.83% | 9.41% | 9.56% | 10.96% | 7.69% | 9.71% | 9.45% | 10.04% | 13.06% | 6.87% | 5.90% | 10.41% |
Financials
CODX vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Co-Diagnostics, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CODX and CRT have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CODX has higher volatility (122.80%) compared to CRT (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CODX dropped -99.86% vs CRT's -83.57%.
CRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CODX and CRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer