TRP.TO vs. BR
TRP.TO (TC Energy Corporation) and BR (Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.) are both stocks. TRP.TO operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while BR operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, TRP.TO returned 11.53%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for BR. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRP.TO vs. BR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TRP.TO is traded in CAD, while BR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRP.TO achieves a 29.69% return, which is significantly higher than BR's -32.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRP.TO having a 11.53% annualized return and BR not far behind at 11.38%.
TRP.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 29.69%
- 6M
- 31.68%
- 1Y
- 49.18%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
BR
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- -32.88%
- 6M
- -35.27%
- 1Y
- -36.90%
- 3Y*
- 0.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
TRP.TO vs. BR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRP.TO TC Energy Corporation | 29.69% | 18.35% | 37.67% | 2.53% | -2.77% | 20.34% | -20.74% | 48.49% | -16.01% | 5.23% |
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | -32.88% | -4.31% | 21.11% | 52.51% | -20.53% | 21.06% | 23.29% | 25.21% | 16.93% | 29.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRP.TO and BR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007 | 0.18 |
The correlation between TRP.TO and BR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRP.TO:
CA$101.12B
BR:
$16.95B
TRP.TO:
CA$3.31
BR:
$9.35
TRP.TO:
29.36
BR:
15.50
TRP.TO:
0.39
BR:
1.37
TRP.TO:
6.41
BR:
2.33
TRP.TO:
4.00
BR:
6.01
TRP.TO:
CA$15.76B
BR:
$7.32B
TRP.TO:
CA$8.07B
BR:
$2.29B
TRP.TO:
CA$10.90B
BR:
$1.98B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRP.TO vs. BR — Risk / Return Rank
TRP.TO
BR
TRP.TO vs. BR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRP.TO | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.74 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | -0.81 | +6.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.62 | -1.50 | +18.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRP.TO vs. BR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRP.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.30%, smaller than the maximum BR drawdown of -48.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRP.TO and BR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRP.TO | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.30% | -48.09% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -45.81% | +37.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.57% | -45.81% | +30.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.02% | -45.81% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | -45.81% | +9.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -43.73% | +42.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.45% | -8.37% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 24.71% | -21.63% |
Volatility
TRP.TO vs. BR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) is 5.44%, while Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that TRP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRP.TO | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 8.79% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 22.03% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 26.08% | -9.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 24.08% | -4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 24.74% | -1.51% |
Dividends
TRP.TO vs. BR - Dividend Comparison
TRP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than BR's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 2.69% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.48% | 2.04% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.53% | 1.90% | 2.12% |
TRP.TO TC Energy Corporation | 3.53% | 4.50% | 5.40% | 6.71% | 6.67% | 5.92% | 6.26% | 4.34% | 5.66% | 4.09% | 3.73% | 4.60% |
Financials
TRP.TO vs. BR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TC Energy Corporation and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRP.TO vs. BR - Profitability Comparison
TRP.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TC Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.40B and revenue of 4.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
BR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 626.90M and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
TRP.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TC Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 2.21B and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.1%.
BR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 359.50M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
TRP.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TC Energy Corporation reported a net income of 927.00M and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
BR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 276.30M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRP.TO and BR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TRP.TO and BR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer