PortfoliosLab logo
TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TRP.TO and ATD.TO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TRP.TO:

2.92

ATD.TO:

-0.32

Sortino Ratio

TRP.TO:

3.42

ATD.TO:

-0.50

Omega Ratio

TRP.TO:

1.47

ATD.TO:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

TRP.TO:

2.57

ATD.TO:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

TRP.TO:

16.34

ATD.TO:

-0.88

Ulcer Index

TRP.TO:

3.20%

ATD.TO:

11.40%

Daily Std Dev

TRP.TO:

19.14%

ATD.TO:

23.34%

Max Drawdown

TRP.TO:

-60.13%

ATD.TO:

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

TRP.TO:

-2.59%

ATD.TO:

-99.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRP.TO:

CA$71.95B

ATD.TO:

CA$69.17B

EPS

TRP.TO:

CA$4.03

ATD.TO:

CA$3.74

PE Ratio

TRP.TO:

17.13

ATD.TO:

19.51

PS Ratio

TRP.TO:

5.18

ATD.TO:

0.93

PB Ratio

TRP.TO:

2.86

ATD.TO:

3.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRP.TO:

CA$12.98B

ATD.TO:

CA$56.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRP.TO:

CA$6.19B

ATD.TO:

CA$10.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRP.TO achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly higher than ATD.TO's -9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, TRP.TO has underperformed ATD.TO with an annualized return of 9.15%, while ATD.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.


TRP.TO

YTD

3.99%

1M

-1.01%

6M

3.85%

1Y

55.26%

3Y*

7.67%

5Y*

10.58%

10Y*

9.15%

ATD.TO

YTD

-9.93%

1M

-1.19%

6M

-13.08%

1Y

-7.41%

3Y*

8.19%

5Y*

11.56%

10Y*

11.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TC Energy Corporation

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRP.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRP.TO is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRP.TO is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRP.TO is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRP.TO is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRP.TO is 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRP.TO is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ATD.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATD.TO is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATD.TO is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATD.TO is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATD.TO is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATD.TO is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATD.TO is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TRP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the ATD.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRP.TO and ATD.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO - Dividend Comparison

TRP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than ATD.TO's 1.03% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TRP.TO
TC Energy Corporation
4.97%5.14%7.18%6.67%5.91%6.26%4.34%5.67%4.09%3.74%4.61%3.37%
ATD.TO
Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.
1.03%0.90%0.76%0.79%0.70%0.68%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRP.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.13%, smaller than the maximum ATD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRP.TO and ATD.TO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TC Energy Corporation (TRP.TO) is 5.52%, while Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that TRP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TC Energy Corporation and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
3.62B
20.90B
(TRP.TO) Total Revenue
(ATD.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

TRP.TO vs. ATD.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TC Energy Corporation and Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
52.0%
18.0%
(TRP.TO) Gross Margin
(ATD.TO) Gross Margin
TRP.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TC Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.89B and revenue of 3.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

ATD.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.76B and revenue of 20.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.

TRP.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TC Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 1.66B and revenue of 3.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

ATD.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 972.00M and revenue of 20.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

TRP.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, TC Energy Corporation reported a net income of 1.01B and revenue of 3.62B, resulting in a net margin of 27.8%.

ATD.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 641.40M and revenue of 20.90B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.