PortfoliosLab logo
BR vs. FDS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BR and FDS is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BR vs. FDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BR:

1.16

FDS:

0.24

Sortino Ratio

BR:

1.28

FDS:

0.51

Omega Ratio

BR:

1.18

FDS:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

BR:

1.66

FDS:

0.28

Martin Ratio

BR:

6.14

FDS:

0.70

Ulcer Index

BR:

3.19%

FDS:

7.65%

Daily Std Dev

BR:

21.52%

FDS:

22.30%

Max Drawdown

BR:

-59.02%

FDS:

-58.96%

Current Drawdown

BR:

-3.76%

FDS:

-7.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BR:

$27.84B

FDS:

$17.25B

EPS

BR:

$6.66

FDS:

$14.09

PE Ratio

BR:

35.59

FDS:

32.27

PEG Ratio

BR:

1.68

FDS:

2.18

PS Ratio

BR:

4.11

FDS:

7.65

PB Ratio

BR:

11.64

FDS:

8.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

BR:

$6.77B

FDS:

$2.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BR:

$2.06B

FDS:

$1.22B

EBITDA (TTM)

BR:

$1.56B

FDS:

$891.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BR achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly higher than FDS's -5.13% return. Over the past 10 years, BR has outperformed FDS with an annualized return of 18.61%, while FDS has yielded a comparatively lower 11.99% annualized return.


BR

YTD

5.24%

1M

3.77%

6M

6.04%

1Y

23.05%

5Y*

16.73%

10Y*

18.61%

FDS

YTD

-5.13%

1M

9.10%

6M

-4.36%

1Y

4.51%

5Y*

10.77%

10Y*

11.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BR vs. FDS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BR is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BR is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BR is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BR is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BR is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BR is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDS is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDS is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDS is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDS is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDS is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BR vs. FDS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BR Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the FDS Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BR and FDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BR vs. FDS - Dividend Comparison

BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than FDS's 0.92% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.45%1.49%1.48%2.04%1.33%1.46%1.66%1.77%1.53%1.90%2.12%2.08%
FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
0.92%0.85%0.80%0.87%0.66%0.91%1.04%1.24%1.13%1.19%1.05%1.08%

Drawdowns

BR vs. FDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BR drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FDS drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BR and FDS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BR vs. FDS - Volatility Comparison

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) at 7.34%. This indicates that BR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BR vs. FDS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and FactSet Research Systems Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
1.81B
570.66M
(BR) Total Revenue
(FDS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BR vs. FDS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and FactSet Research Systems Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
31.8%
52.8%
(BR) Gross Margin
(FDS) Gross Margin
BR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 575.80M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.

FDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a gross profit of 301.06M and revenue of 570.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.8%.

BR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 344.90M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.0%.

FDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported an operating income of 185.49M and revenue of 570.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.

BR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 243.10M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

FDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a net income of 144.86M and revenue of 570.66M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.