PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BR vs. FDS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


BRFDS
YTD Return7.40%-1.20%
1Y Return25.13%5.77%
3Y Return (Ann)9.84%2.46%
5Y Return (Ann)14.64%14.20%
10Y Return (Ann)19.43%14.50%
Sharpe Ratio1.410.31
Sortino Ratio1.990.54
Omega Ratio1.261.07
Calmar Ratio2.980.34
Martin Ratio7.210.66
Ulcer Index3.50%9.80%
Daily Std Dev17.94%20.82%
Max Drawdown-59.02%-58.96%
Current Drawdown-1.56%-3.60%

Fundamentals


BRFDS
Market Cap$24.50B$17.54B
EPS$5.87$13.90
PE Ratio35.7133.22
PEG Ratio1.772.33
Total Revenue (TTM)$5.08B$2.20B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.58B$1.19B
EBITDA (TTM)$1.24B$867.01M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between BR and FDS is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

BR vs. FDS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BR achieves a 7.40% return, which is significantly higher than FDS's -1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BR has outperformed FDS with an annualized return of 19.43%, while FDS has yielded a comparatively lower 14.50% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.31%
8.01%
BR
FDS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BR vs. FDS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) and FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BR, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BR, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BR, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BR, currently valued at 2.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.98
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BR, currently valued at 7.21, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.21
FDS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FDS, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.66

BR vs. FDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BR Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the FDS Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BR and FDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.41
0.31
BR
FDS

Dividends

BR vs. FDS - Dividend Comparison

BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than FDS's 0.86% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.50%1.48%2.04%1.33%1.46%1.66%1.77%1.53%1.90%2.12%2.08%1.97%
FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
0.86%0.80%0.87%0.66%0.91%1.04%1.24%1.13%1.19%1.05%1.08%1.25%

Drawdowns

BR vs. FDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BR drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FDS drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BR and FDS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.56%
-3.60%
BR
FDS

Volatility

BR vs. FDS - Volatility Comparison

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) at 4.09%. This indicates that BR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.51%
4.09%
BR
FDS

Financials

BR vs. FDS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. and FactSet Research Systems Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items