PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TROSX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TROSX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TROSX achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TROSX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.70%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.


TROSX

1D
2.97%
1M
0.74%
YTD
9.14%
6M
11.06%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
9.70%

SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TROSX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TROSX
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund
9.14%31.78%2.91%16.34%-15.42%12.24%9.24%22.91%-15.08%27.05%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TROSX and SCHG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.73

The correlation between TROSX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TROSX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TROSX
TROSX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TROSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TROSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TROSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TROSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TROSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TROSX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TROSXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.14

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.02

3.78

+3.24

TROSX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TROSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TROSX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TROSX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TROSX drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TROSX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TROSXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.62%

-34.59%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-16.41%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.02%

-23.39%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.45%

-34.59%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.34%

-34.59%

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-5.33%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.44%

-5.20%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

4.96%

-1.59%

Volatility

TROSX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (TROSX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.14%. This indicates that TROSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TROSXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

5.14%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

12.30%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

15.95%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

22.33%

-6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

21.58%

-4.59%

TROSX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TROSX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TROSX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TROSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
TROSX
T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund
1.87%2.05%2.38%2.28%2.38%1.88%1.41%2.14%3.33%1.86%1.98%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


TROSX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TROSX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TROSX dropped -60.62% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

TROSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TROSX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer