TRNS vs. GHM
TRNS (Transcat, Inc.) and GHM (Graham Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — TRNS in Industrial Distribution, GHM in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 10 years, TRNS returned 24.25%/yr vs 20.85%/yr for GHM. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRNS vs. GHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRNS achieves a 57.69% return, which is significantly lower than GHM's 70.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TRNS has outperformed GHM with an annualized return of 24.25%, while GHM has yielded a comparatively lower 20.85% annualized return.
TRNS
- 1D
- -3.55%
- 1M
- 22.51%
- YTD
- 57.69%
- 6M
- 54.64%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 0.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 24.25%
GHM
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 15.60%
- YTD
- 70.90%
- 6M
- 57.94%
- 1Y
- 126.80%
- 3Y*
- 104.32%
- 5Y*
- 52.40%
- 10Y*
- 20.85%
TRNS vs. GHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRNS Transcat, Inc. | 57.69% | -46.35% | -3.28% | 54.27% | -23.33% | 166.52% | 8.85% | 67.51% | 33.47% | 31.94% |
GHM Graham Corporation | 70.90% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRNS and GHM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, TRNS and GHM have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TRNS:
$836.00M
GHM:
$1.22B
TRNS:
$0.58
GHM:
$1.12
TRNS:
155.42
GHM:
97.61
TRNS:
2.52
GHM:
4.97
TRNS:
2.78
GHM:
8.71
TRNS:
$331.88M
GHM:
$245.29M
TRNS:
$108.40M
GHM:
$57.75M
TRNS:
$33.66M
GHM:
$14.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRNS vs. GHM — Risk / Return Rank
TRNS
GHM
TRNS vs. GHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) and Graham Corporation (GHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRNS | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 7.00 | -6.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | 16.97 | -16.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRNS vs. GHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRNS drawdown since its inception was -93.42%, which is greater than GHM's maximum drawdown of -86.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRNS and GHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRNS | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.42% | -86.11% | -7.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.92% | -18.21% | -24.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.86% | -46.46% | -17.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.86% | -52.63% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.86% | -74.83% | +10.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.91% | -5.28% | -32.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.38% | -47.34% | +11.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.28% | 7.50% | +14.78% |
Volatility
TRNS vs. GHM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) is 14.10%, while Graham Corporation (GHM) has a volatility of 20.14%. This indicates that TRNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRNS | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.10% | 20.14% | -6.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.49% | 39.55% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.62% | 52.80% | -5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.53% | 49.51% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.48% | 45.31% | -2.83% |
Dividends
TRNS vs. GHM - Dividend Comparison
Neither TRNS nor GHM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
TRNS Transcat, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRNS vs. GHM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transcat, Inc. and Graham Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRNS vs. GHM - Profitability Comparison
TRNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transcat, Inc. reported a gross profit of 30.47M and revenue of 88.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.
GHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.69M and revenue of 67.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
TRNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transcat, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.73M and revenue of 88.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
GHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported an operating income of 1.72M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.6%.
TRNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Transcat, Inc. reported a net income of 744.00K and revenue of 88.62M, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.
GHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a net income of 1.97M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRNS and GHM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHM has higher volatility (20.14%) compared to TRNS (14.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRNS dropped -93.42% vs GHM's -86.11%.
GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRNS and GHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer