PortfoliosLab logo
TRNS vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TRNS and SCHG is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TRNS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

TRNS:

40.40%

SCHG:

12.37%

Max Drawdown

TRNS:

-3.48%

SCHG:

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

TRNS:

-1.16%

SCHG:

-0.15%

Returns By Period


TRNS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SCHG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRNS vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRNS is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRNS is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRNS is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRNS is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRNS is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRNS is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TRNS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

TRNS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TRNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TRNS
Transcat, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRNS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRNS drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -0.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRNS and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TRNS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...