TRNS vs. SCHG

In the year-to-date period, TRNS achieves a -17.36% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, TRNS has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 24.08%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.84% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TRNS Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRNS and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TRNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

The maximum TRNS drawdown since its inception was -93.33%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRNS and SCHG.

Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) has a higher volatility of 17.97% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.75%. This indicates that TRNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.