TRNS vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TRNS or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between TRNS and SCHG is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TRNS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TRNS:
-0.49
SCHG:
1.64
TRNS:
-0.40
SCHG:
2.19
TRNS:
0.94
SCHG:
1.30
TRNS:
-0.48
SCHG:
2.37
TRNS:
-1.16
SCHG:
8.98
TRNS:
20.05%
SCHG:
3.27%
TRNS:
47.12%
SCHG:
17.91%
TRNS:
-93.33%
SCHG:
-34.59%
TRNS:
-41.99%
SCHG:
-1.27%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRNS achieves a -20.96% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, TRNS has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 25.05%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 16.44% annualized return.
TRNS
-20.96%
-20.08%
-31.31%
-19.77%
21.99%
25.05%
SCHG
3.09%
0.91%
13.95%
31.06%
18.74%
16.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TRNS vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TRNS
SCHG
TRNS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TRNS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
TRNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRNS Transcat, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
TRNS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRNS drawdown since its inception was -93.33%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRNS and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TRNS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) has a higher volatility of 22.88% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.01%. This indicates that TRNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.