PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRNS vs. EYPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRNS vs. EYPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) and Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals Inc (EYPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRNS achieves a 59.00% return, which is significantly higher than EYPT's -32.46% return. Over the past 10 years, TRNS has outperformed EYPT with an annualized return of 24.18%, while EYPT has yielded a comparatively lower -9.93% annualized return.


TRNS

1D
-0.40%
1M
27.82%
YTD
59.00%
6M
63.23%
1Y
4.94%
3Y*
0.76%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
24.18%

EYPT

1D
-1.52%
1M
-10.90%
YTD
-32.46%
6M
-15.01%
1Y
51.97%
3Y*
27.31%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
-9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRNS vs. EYPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRNS
Transcat, Inc.
59.00%-46.35%-3.28%54.27%-23.33%166.52%8.85%67.51%33.47%31.94%
EYPT
Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals Inc
-32.46%145.23%-67.76%560.29%-71.41%86.02%-57.55%-17.99%75.00%-36.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TRNS and EYPT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2005

0.10

The correlation between TRNS and EYPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TRNS:

$0.58

EYPT:

-$3.12

PS Ratio

TRNS:

2.54

EYPT:

29.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRNS:

$331.88M

EYPT:

$31.37M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRNS:

$108.40M

EYPT:

$29.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRNS:

$33.66M

EYPT:

-$239.53M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRNS vs. EYPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRNS
TRNS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TRNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRNS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TRNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRNS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

EYPT
EYPT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EYPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYPT Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
EYPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYPT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRNS vs. EYPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) and Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals Inc (EYPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRNSEYPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.18

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

1.38

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.22

2.96

-2.74

TRNS vs. EYPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRNS Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the EYPT Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRNS and EYPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRNSEYPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

0.78

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.05

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

-0.10

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.09

+0.26

Drawdowns

TRNS vs. EYPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRNS drawdown since its inception was -93.42%, roughly equal to the maximum EYPT drawdown of -97.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRNS and EYPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRNSEYPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.42%

-97.73%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.92%

-37.93%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.86%

-86.10%

+22.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.86%

-87.61%

+23.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.86%

-94.45%

+30.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.39%

-87.71%

+50.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.38%

-76.41%

+41.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.35%

17.60%

+4.75%

Volatility

TRNS vs. EYPT - Volatility Comparison

Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) has a higher volatility of 18.16% compared to Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals Inc (EYPT) at 14.28%. This indicates that TRNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EYPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRNSEYPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.16%

14.28%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.36%

45.65%

-10.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.62%

67.49%

-19.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.36%

118.34%

-74.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.39%

100.38%

-57.99%

Dividends

TRNS vs. EYPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither TRNS nor EYPT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TRNS vs. EYPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Transcat, Inc. and Eyepoint Pharmaceuticals Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20222023202420252026
88.62M
620.00K
(TRNS) Total Revenue
(EYPT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRNS and EYPT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRNS has higher volatility (18.16%) compared to EYPT (14.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRNS dropped -93.42% vs EYPT's -97.73%.

EYPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRNS and EYPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer