TRND vs. GFGF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and GFGF (Guru Favorite Stocks ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TRND is passively managed, while GFGF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRND returned 11.99%/yr vs 17.85%/yr for GFGF. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GFGF.

Performance

TRND vs. GFGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than GFGF's 1.26% return.

TRND

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: —

GFGF

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: 3.38%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRND vs. GFGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	10.26%	6.03%	11.97%	16.48%	-15.37%	1.69%
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	1.26%	13.11%	26.12%	24.03%	-20.32%	2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TRND and GFGF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.78

The correlation between TRND and GFGF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

TRND vs. GFGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TRND	GFGF
Technology	30.6%	32.7%
Industrials	13.4%	2.5%
Financial Services	13.2%	31.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	6.8%
Communication Services	7.7%	11.2%
Healthcare	7.4%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	3.1%
Energy	3.8%	-
Basic Materials	3.4%	-
Real Estate	2.7%	2.0%
Utilities	2.3%	-

Return for Risk

TRND vs. GFGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRND

TRND Risk / Return Rank: 58
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 63

GFGF

GFGF Risk / Return Rank: 24
GFGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
GFGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
GFGF Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GFGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
GFGF Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRND vs. GFGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRND	GFGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	0.96	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.39	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.17	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	0.80	+1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	2.73	+8.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRND vs. GFGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the GFGF Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRND and GFGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRND	GFGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	0.96	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.46	+0.19

Drawdowns

TRND vs. GFGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum GFGF drawdown of -27.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and GFGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRND	GFGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.88%	-27.98%	+10.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-15.22%	+7.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.56%	-15.60%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.74%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.22%	-8.26%	+3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	4.43%	-2.53%

Volatility

TRND vs. GFGF - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Guru Favorite Stocks ETF (GFGF) at 3.05%. This indicates that TRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRND	GFGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.05%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.97%	9.56%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.23%	12.59%	-1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.71%	19.09%	-9.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.18%	19.09%	-7.91%

TRND vs. GFGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than GFGF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRND vs. GFGF - Dividend Comparison

TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than GFGF's 0.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GFGF Guru Favorite Stocks ETF	0.21%	0.21%	0.10%	0.08%	0.42%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	2.10%	2.32%	2.31%	2.51%	1.76%	0.93%	0.60%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRND and GFGF in my portfolio?

TRND and GFGF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRND or GFGF?

TRND has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to GFGF (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs GFGF's -27.98%.

Which ETF is better, TRND or GFGF?

On 3-year performance, GFGF leads with 17.85% vs 11.99% for TRND. On fees, GFGF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GFGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRND or GFGF?

Over the 3-year period, GFGF has performed better with a 17.85% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRND or GFGF?

GFGF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRND or GFGF?

TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.21% for GFGF.

What is the main difference between TRND and GFGF?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and GuruFocus. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.65% for GFGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.