TRIS.L vs. INXG.L
TRIS.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist) and INXG.L (iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - TRIS.L tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index while INXG.L tracks the Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRIS.L returned 4.36%/yr vs -8.26%/yr for INXG.L. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. TRIS.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for INXG.L.
Performance
TRIS.L vs. INXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TRIS.L is traded in GBp, while INXG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the INXG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIS.L achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than INXG.L's 0.04% return.
TRIS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- —
INXG.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- -0.63%
- 5Y*
- -8.26%
- 10Y*
- -1.18%
TRIS.L vs. INXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIS.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist | 1.60% | -2.79% | 6.84% | -0.75% | 12.57% | 1.25% | -3.44% |
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | 0.04% | 1.10% | -8.66% | 0.16% | -34.27% | 4.08% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIS.L and INXG.L is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2020 | -0.05 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TRIS.L and INXG.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRIS.L vs. INXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
TRIS.L
INXG.L
TRIS.L vs. INXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIS.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.06 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 0.50 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 1.08 | +1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIS.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.33 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | -0.41 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | -0.71 | +0.97 |
Drawdowns
TRIS.L vs. INXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.99%, smaller than the maximum INXG.L drawdown of -99.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIS.L and INXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIS.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -99.05% | +80.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.49% | -6.62% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.71% | -15.04% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.37% | -50.87% | +35.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.66% | -98.31% | +92.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.81% | -97.27% | +87.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 3.06% | -1.28% |
Volatility
TRIS.L vs. INXG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) is 2.02%, while iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that TRIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRIS.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 3.49% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.71% | 7.26% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.45% | 9.89% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.34% | 20.07% | -11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.80% | 17.47% | -8.67% |
TRIS.L vs. INXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIS.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than INXG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRIS.L vs. INXG.L - Dividend Comparison
TRIS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than INXG.L's 7.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | 7.56% | 7.23% | 5.77% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 1.36% | 1.95% | 1.28% | 0.65% | 1.94% |
TRIS.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist | 4.01% | 4.26% | 4.87% | 4.68% | 1.52% | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRIS.L and INXG.L have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRIS.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRIS.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for INXG.L.
TRIS.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index, while INXG.L tracks Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRIS.L and 0.10% for INXG.L.
Find the right allocation for TRIS.L and INXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer