PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIO vs. SIXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIO vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIO achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 11.82% return.


TRIO

1D
0.35%
1M
0.57%
6M
5.35%
YTD
6.52%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.20%

SIXH

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.25%
6M
6.67%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$192.69K$438.81K$385.38K
$43.78K$78.89K$68.56K

TRIO vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TRIO and SIXH is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.25

The correlation between TRIO and SIXH shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIO vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRIO
TRIO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TRIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRIO vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRIOSIXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.59

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

9.12

+4.52

TRIO vs. SIXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SIXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIO and SIXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRIO vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIO drawdown since its inception was -9.88%, smaller than the maximum SIXH drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIO and SIXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRIOSIXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-11.68%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.47%

-4.36%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-1.63%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-1.82%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.71%

-0.80%

Volatility

TRIO vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) is 1.93%, while 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that TRIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRIOSIXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

2.48%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

6.36%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.39%

7.87%

-1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.31%

10.40%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.31%

10.09%

+0.22%

TRIO vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRIO vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison

TRIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than SIXH's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.82%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%
TRIO
MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF
8.46%9.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIO and SIXH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXH has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to TRIO (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIO dropped -9.88% vs SIXH's -11.68%.

On 1-year performance, SIXH leads with 15.44% vs 13.07% for TRIO. On fees, TRIO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, TRIO has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 15.44% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TRIO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

TRIO has the higher dividend yield at 8.46%, compared with 1.82% for SIXH.

They also come from different issuers: McCarthy & Cox and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TRIO and 0.87% for SIXH.

SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIO and SIXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer