PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIN vs. UMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIN vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIN achieves a 31.04% return, which is significantly higher than UMI's 25.30% return.


TRIN

1D
1.60%
1M
1.20%
6M
16.17%
YTD
31.04%
1Y
37.70%
3Y*
24.50%
5Y*
19.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.65%

UMI

1D
-1.10%
1M
2.58%
6M
18.10%
YTD
25.30%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
25.99%
5Y*
22.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.55M$17.26M$18.03M
$1.15M$1.04M$1.15M

TRIN vs. UMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
31.04%16.01%14.83%53.97%-26.60%36.20%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
25.30%5.11%42.97%14.60%20.78%17.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIN and UMI is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.28

The correlation between TRIN and UMI shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIN vs. UMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRIN
TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

UMI
UMI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRIN vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRINUMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

3.60

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

9.01

-2.69

TRIN vs. UMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the UMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIN and UMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRIN vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIN drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum UMI drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIN and UMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRINUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-48.08%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-7.50%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-17.08%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.12%

-20.05%

-23.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-3.08%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-6.53%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.98%

2.99%

+2.99%

Volatility

TRIN vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) is 4.94%, while USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that TRIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRINUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

5.31%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

11.73%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.48%

14.64%

+5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.65%

19.36%

+7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.75%

23.09%

+3.66%

Dividends

TRIN vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.39%, more than UMI's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
12.39%13.92%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
5.86%6.23%4.39%4.67%4.36%3.00%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIN and UMI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMI has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to TRIN (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIN dropped -43.12% vs UMI's -48.08%.

TRIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIN and UMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer