PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TRFK vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TRFK vs. XLB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XLB is a Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRFK returned 48.69%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for XLB. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.

Performance

TRFK vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 57.84% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 15.57% return.

TRFK

1D
1.49%
1M
11.87%
YTD
57.84%
6M
56.78%
1Y
84.43%
3Y*
48.69%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

XLB

1D
1.87%
1M
0.23%
YTD
15.57%
6M
16.68%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRFK vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		57.84%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF		15.57%9.94%0.15%12.46%-8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and XLB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.51

The correlation between TRFK and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TRFK vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TRFK
XLB

Technology

91.8%

-

Industrials

8.3%
1.5%

Basic Materials

-

87.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TRFK
91.8%
XLB

-

Industrials

TRFK
8.3%
XLB
1.5%

Basic Materials

TRFK

-

XLB
87.6%

Communication Services

TRFK

-

XLB

-

Consumer Cyclical

TRFK

-

XLB
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

TRFK

-

XLB

-

Energy

TRFK

-

XLB

-

Financial Services

TRFK

-

XLB

-

Healthcare

TRFK

-

XLB

-

Real Estate

TRFK

-

XLB

-

Utilities

TRFK

-

XLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF

Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF

Often compared with TRFK:
TRFK vs. FDTXTRFK vs. DTCRTRFK vs. IDGTTRFK vs. FRATRFK vs. PRNTRFK vs. SPYGTRFK vs. VRGWX
Often compared with XLB:
XLB vs. REMXXLB vs. VAWXLB vs. XLEXLB vs. SPYXLB vs. FMATXLB vs. XLYXLB vs. XLK

Return for Risk

TRFK vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFK vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TRFKXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.79
1.17

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.30
1.73

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.20

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

1.65

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

5.05

+5.16

TRFK vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and XLB.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TRFKXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-59.83%

+30.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.56%

-12.38%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.06%

-23.17%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-24.72%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.27%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-2.25%

-4.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-10.83%

+4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.29%

4.04%

+4.25%

Volatility

TRFK vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 16.11% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 7.05%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TRFKXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.11%

7.05%

+9.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.34%

13.58%

+11.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.41%

17.49%

+12.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.48%

19.06%

+10.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.48%

20.70%

+8.78%

TRFK vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRFK vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XLB's 1.68% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF		1.68%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

TRFK and XLB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRFK has higher volatility (16.11%) compared to XLB (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFK dropped -29.06% vs XLB's -59.83%.

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 48.69% vs 10.88% for XLB. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLB has been the lower-risk option at 7.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 48.69% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

TRFK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLB is Materials. TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 0.13% for XLB.

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRFK and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer