PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TRFK vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TRFK vs. NLR

Last updated Jul 21, 2026
Documentation

TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRFK returned 41.91%/yr vs 23.46%/yr for NLR. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.

Performance

TRFK vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 41.76% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -15.40% return.

TRFK

1D
0.61%
1M
-16.90%
6M
38.73%
YTD
41.76%
1Y
48.18%
3Y*
41.91%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
37.49%

NLR

1D
0.83%
1M
-17.23%
6M
-29.26%
YTD
-15.40%
1Y
-8.06%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
10.66%
ALL TIME*
3.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRFK vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		41.76%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		-15.40%56.50%14.26%36.67%-1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and NLR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022

0.54

The correlation between TRFK and NLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

TRFK vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TRFK
NLR

Technology

87.4%
1.6%

Industrials

12.0%
21.8%

Basic Materials

0.9%
2.3%

Communication Services

0.6%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

48.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

26.2%

Technology

TRFK
87.4%
NLR
1.6%

Industrials

TRFK
12.0%
NLR
21.8%

Basic Materials

TRFK
0.9%
NLR
2.3%

Communication Services

TRFK
0.6%
NLR

-

Real Estate

TRFK
0.0%
NLR

-

Consumer Cyclical

TRFK

-

NLR

-

Consumer Defensive

TRFK

-

NLR

-

Energy

TRFK

-

NLR
48.2%

Financial Services

TRFK

-

NLR

-

Healthcare

TRFK

-

NLR

-

Utilities

TRFK

-

NLR
26.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF

Often compared with TRFK:
TRFK vs. FDTXTRFK vs. DTCRTRFK vs. IDGTTRFK vs. FRATRFK vs. PRNTRFK vs. SPYGTRFK vs. VRGWX
Often compared with NLR:
NLR vs. URANLR vs. NUKZNLR vs. URNMNLR vs. OKLONLR vs. GRIDNLR vs. URANNLR vs. SMH

Return for Risk

TRFK vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFK vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TRFKNLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.39
-0.19

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.87
0.03

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.00

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

-0.22

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

-0.50

+5.91

TRFK vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and NLR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TRFKNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-65.05%

+35.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.56%

-36.61%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.06%

-36.61%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-36.61%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.61%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.31%

-36.08%

+17.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.13%

-35.67%

+29.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.93%

16.20%

-7.27%

Volatility

TRFK vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) at 9.51%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TRFKNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.12%

9.51%

+7.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.06%

32.62%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.92%

43.18%

-8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.45%

29.88%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.45%

24.43%

+6.02%

TRFK vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRFK vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NLR's 3.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF		3.01%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF		0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

TRFK and NLR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRFK has higher volatility (17.12%) compared to NLR (9.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFK dropped -29.06% vs NLR's -65.05%.

On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 41.91% vs 23.46% for NLR. On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, NLR has been the lower-risk option at 9.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 41.91% return vs 23.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TRFK.

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

TRFK is categorized as Technology Equities, while NLR is Uranium. TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 0.56% for NLR.

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRFK and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer