TRET.L vs. SGLD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and SGLD.L (Invesco Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - TRET.L is a REIT fund tracking the GPR Global 100 Index, while SGLD.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRET.L returned 2.34%/yr vs 18.60%/yr for SGLD.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRET.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SGLD.L.

Performance

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRET.L achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than SGLD.L's 3.72% return.

TRET.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 4.02%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: 10.68%
• 3Y*: 10.83%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: —

SGLD.L

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 3.72%
• 6M: 6.06%
• 1Y: 32.43%
• 3Y*: 31.54%
• 5Y*: 18.60%
• 10Y*: 13.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	4.02%	14.43%	1.05%	13.94%	-25.68%	29.73%	-6.91%	10.01%
SGLD.L Invesco Physical Gold ETC	3.72%	64.87%	26.23%	13.36%	-0.08%	-4.08%	24.18%	18.43%

Correlation

The correlation between TRET.L and SGLD.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019	0.19

Return for Risk

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRET.L

TRET.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
TRET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
TRET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TRET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TRET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TRET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

SGLD.L

SGLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SGLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SGLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SGLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
SGLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRET.L	SGLD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.31	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.74	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.25	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	1.86	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	4.82	-1.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.L and SGLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRET.L	SGLD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	1.31	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	1.08	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.58	-0.36

Drawdowns

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.L drawdown since its inception was -42.26%, smaller than the maximum SGLD.L drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.L and SGLD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRET.L	SGLD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.26%	-45.21%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.49%	-17.34%	+6.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-17.34%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.35%	-21.12%	-12.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.89%	-15.61%	+9.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-18.20%	+6.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	6.72%	-3.72%

Volatility

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) is 3.91%, while Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that TRET.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRET.L	SGLD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	6.34%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.60%	21.72%	-12.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	24.72%	-12.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	17.29%	-0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.18%	15.50%	+3.68%

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRET.L vs. SGLD.L - Dividend Comparison

TRET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, while SGLD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SGLD.L Invesco Physical Gold ETC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	3.49%	3.54%	3.56%	3.54%	4.56%	1.86%	4.18%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRET.L and SGLD.L in my portfolio?

TRET.L and SGLD.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRET.L or SGLD.L?

On fees, SGLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRET.L or SGLD.L?

SGLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TRET.L.

What is the main difference between TRET.L and SGLD.L?

TRET.L is categorized as REIT, while SGLD.L is Gold. TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index, while SGLD.L tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.L and 0.12% for SGLD.L.