TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and QOZ.AX (BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRET.L is a REIT fund tracking the GPR Global 100 Index, while QOZ.AX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRET.L returned 2.29%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for QOZ.AX. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRET.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QOZ.AX.

Performance

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TRET.L is traded in USD, while QOZ.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the QOZ.AX values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRET.L achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than QOZ.AX's 13.25% return.

TRET.L

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 6M: 3.63%
• 1Y: 10.56%
• 3Y*: 10.72%
• 5Y*: 2.29%
• 10Y*: —

QOZ.AX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 13.25%
• 6M: 17.11%
• 1Y: 31.29%
• 3Y*: 17.98%
• 5Y*: 8.59%
• 10Y*: 10.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	3.80%	14.43%	1.05%	13.94%	-25.68%	29.73%	-6.91%	10.01%
QOZ.AX BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF	13.25%	26.08%	0.53%	11.38%	-1.10%	10.63%	9.60%	13.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TRET.L and QOZ.AX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019	0.38

The correlation between TRET.L and QOZ.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRET.L

TRET.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
TRET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TRET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TRET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TRET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TRET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

QOZ.AX

QOZ.AX Risk / Return Rank: 45
QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QOZ.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QOZ.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
QOZ.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
QOZ.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRET.L	QOZ.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	2.08	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	3.00	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.37	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	3.01	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	9.71	-6.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the QOZ.AX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.L and QOZ.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRET.L	QOZ.AX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	2.08	-1.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.49	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.41	-0.19

Drawdowns

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.L drawdown since its inception was -42.26%, smaller than the maximum QOZ.AX drawdown of -46.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.L and QOZ.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRET.L	QOZ.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.26%	-46.12%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.49%	-10.29%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-22.27%	+5.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.35%	-25.26%	-8.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-3.72%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-8.86%	-3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	3.21%	-0.23%

Volatility

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF (QOZ.AX) at 3.76%. This indicates that TRET.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QOZ.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRET.L	QOZ.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	3.76%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.65%	12.00%	-2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	14.93%	-2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	17.61%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.18%	18.87%	+0.31%

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QOZ.AX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRET.L vs. QOZ.AX - Dividend Comparison

TRET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than QOZ.AX's 3.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QOZ.AX BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF	3.60%	3.88%	4.58%	5.27%	7.24%	3.96%	3.30%	6.45%	6.59%	3.09%	5.46%	8.44%
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	4.51%	3.54%	3.56%	3.54%	4.56%	1.86%	4.18%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRET.L and QOZ.AX in my portfolio?

TRET.L and QOZ.AX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRET.L or QOZ.AX?

On fees, TRET.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRET.L or QOZ.AX?

TRET.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QOZ.AX.

What is the main difference between TRET.L and QOZ.AX?

TRET.L is categorized as REIT, while QOZ.AX is Large Cap Value Equities. TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index, while QOZ.AX tracks FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BetaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.L and 0.40% for QOZ.AX.